xii, 328 pages : 26 cm
"Whether the result of an oil well blowout, vessel collision or grounding, leaking pipeline, or other incident at sea, each marine oil spill will present unique circumstances and challenges. The oil type and properties, location, time of year, duration of spill, water depth, environmental conditions, affected biomes, potential human community impact, and available resources may vary significantly. Also, each spill may be governed by policy guidelines, such as those set forth in the National Response Plan, Regional Response Plans, or Area Contingency Plans. To respond effectively to the specific conditions presented during an oil spill, spill responders have used a variety of response options--including mechanical recovery of oil using skimmers and booms, in situ burning of oil, monitored natural attenuation of oil, and dispersion of oil by chemical dispersants. Because each response method has advantages and disadvantages, it is important to understand specific scenarios where a net benefit may be achieved by using a particular tool or combination of tools. This report builds on two previous National Research Council reports on dispersant use to provide a current understanding of the state of science and to inform future marine oil spill response operations. The response to the 2010 Deepwater Horizon spill included an unprecedented use of dispersants via both surface application and subsea injection. The magnitude of the spill stimulated interest and funding for research on oil spill response, and dispersant use in particular. This study assesses the effects and efficacy of dispersants as an oil spill response tool and evaluates trade-offs associated with dispersant use."--
Includes bibliographical references
1, Introduction -- 2, Fate and transport -- 3, Aquatic toxicology and biological effects -- 4, Human health considerations -- 5, Tools for decision making -- 6, Comparing response options -- 7, Research and decision-making tools -- References -- Appendixes
This activity was supported by the American Petroleum Institute (#2016-110715), the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (#M15PC00004/M17PD00027), Clean Caribbean and Americas, the Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's Gulf Research Program, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (#EP-C-14-005, TO# 17). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Committee on the Evaluation of the Use of Chemical Dispersants in Oil Spill Response, issuing body; National Academies Press (U.S.); National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Ocean Studies Board, issuing body; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, issuing body; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Division on Earth and Life Studies, issuing body

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA

Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press

Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP)

Consensus study report, Washington, D.C, 2020

United States, United States of America

1969

cut off text on some pages very close to gutter

2023-06-28