反馈文件质量
upload/newsarch_ebooks/2021/01/22/0268019444.pdf
Whose Justice? Which Rationality? 🔍
Alasdair Chalmers MacIntyre University of Notre Dame Press, 1989
英语 [en] · PDF · 19.7MB · 1989 · 📘 非小说类图书 · 🚀/lgli/lgrs/nexusstc/upload/zlib · Save
描述
Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, the sequel to After Virtue, is a persuasive argument of there not being rationality that is not the rationality of some tradition. MacIntyre examines the problems presented by the existence of rival traditions of inquiry in the cases of four major philosophers: Aristotle, Augustine, Aquinas, and Hume.
备用文件名
upload/motw_shc_2025_10/shc/Whose Justice_ Which Rationality_ - Alasdair C. MacIntyre.pdf
备用文件名
motw/Whose Justice_ Which Rationality_ - Alasdair C. MacIntyre.pdf
备用文件名
nexusstc/Whose Justice? Which Rationality?/c7c68ceedc4b5168cad20bd6f9610e31.pdf
备用文件名
lgli/Macintyre-Justice_opt.pdf
备用文件名
lgrsnf/Macintyre-Justice_opt.pdf
备用文件名
zlib/Society, Politics & Philosophy/General & Miscellaneous Philosophy/Alasdair MacIntyre/Whose Justice? Which Rationality?_2082519.pdf
备选标题
Whose justice? Whose rationality?
备选作者
MacIntyre, Alasdair C
备选作者
Adobe Acrobat 10.1.2
备用出版商
Duckworth
备用版本
Lightning Source Inc. (Tier 3), Notre Dame, Ind, 1988
备用版本
United States, United States of America
备用版本
Notre Dame (Ind.), Unknown, 1988
备用版本
Notre Dame, Ind, Indiana, 1988
备用版本
1st, First Edition, PS, 1988
备用版本
Repr, Notre Dame, Ind, 2008
备用版本
American First, 1988
备用版本
London, 1988
元数据中的注释
Better version
元数据中的注释
0
元数据中的注释
lg928387
元数据中的注释
producers:
PDFScanLib v1.2.2 in Adobe Acrobat 10.1.3
元数据中的注释
{"isbns":["0268019444","9780268019440"],"last_page":211,"publisher":"University of Notre Dame Press"}
元数据中的注释
Memory of the World Librarian: Quintus
元数据中的注释
Includes index.
元数据中的注释
Includes index.
6
元数据中的注释
Указ.
元数据中的注释
РГБ
元数据中的注释
Russian State Library [rgb] MARC:
=001 000549374
=003 RuMoRGB
=005 19920527120000.0
=008 920527s1988\\\\xx\||||\|\\\\\|01\u\eng\d
=017 \\ $a И10394-92 $b РКП
=020 \\ $a 0-268-01942-8
=035 \\ $a (RuMoRGB)OLDI-0180171
=040 \\ $a RuMoRGB $b rus $c RuMoRGB
=041 0\ $a eng
=084 \\ $a Ю252:Х,0 $2 rubbk
=084 \\ $a Х082,0 $2 rubbk
=100 1\ $a MacIntyre, Alasdair C
=242 00 $a Философские проблемы права
=245 00 $a Whose justice? Which rationality? $c Alasdair MacIntyre
=260 \\ $a Notre Dame (Ind.) $b Univ. of Notre Dame press $c Cop. 1988
=300 \\ $a XI, 410 с. $c 24 см
=555 \\ $a Указ.
=852 \\ $a РГБ $b FB $j 5 92-10/60-4 $x 80
备用描述
<p>"MacIntyre has succeeded in compelling us to rethink the most fundamental moral issues that we face as human beings."-- Commonweal</p> <h3>Publishers Weekly</h3> <p>Is there any cause or war worth risking one's life for? How can we determine which actions are vices and which virtues? MacIntyre, professor of philosophy at Vanderbilt University, unravels these and other such questions by linking the concept of justice to what he calls practical rationality. He rejects the grab-what-you-can, utilitarian yardstick adopted by moral relativists. Instead, he argues that four wholly different, incompatible ideas of justiceput forth by Aristotle, Augustine, Aquinas and Humehave helped shape our modern individualistic world. In his unorthodox view, each person seeks the good through an ongoing dialogue with one of these traditions or within Jewish, non-Western or other historical traditions. This weighty sequel to After Virtue (1981) is certain to stir debate. (February)</p>
备用描述
Is there any cause or war worth risking one's life for? How can we determine which actions are vices and which virtues? MacIntyre, professor of philosophy at Vanderbilt University, unravels these and other such questions by linking the concept of justice to what he calls practical rationality. He rejects the grab-what-you-can, utilitarian yardstick adopted by moral relativists. Instead, he argues that four wholly different, incompatible ideas of justice put forth by Aristotle, Augustine, Aquinas and Hume have helped shape our modern individualistic world. In his unorthodox view, each person seeks the good through an ongoing dialogue with one of these traditions or within Jewish, non-Western or other historical traditions. This weighty sequel to After Virtue (1981) is certain to stir debate.
备用描述
Presents a persuasive argument of there not being rationality that is not the rationality of some tradition. MacIntyre examines the problems presented by the existence of rival traditions of inquiry in the cases of four major philosophers: Aristotle, Augustine, Aquinas, and Hume.
备用描述
Contents 7
开源日期
2013-06-07
更多信息……

🚀 快速下载

成为会员以支持书籍、论文等的长期保存。为了感谢您对我们的支持，您将获得高速下载权益。❤️
如果您在本月捐款，您将获得双倍的快速下载次数。

🐢 低速下载

由可信的合作方提供。 更多信息请参见常见问题解答。 （可能需要验证浏览器——无限次下载！）

所有选项下载的文件都相同，应该可以安全使用。即使这样，从互联网下载文件时始终要小心。例如，确保您的设备更新及时。
显示外部下载
  • 对于大文件，我们建议使用下载管理器以防止中断。
    推荐的下载管理器：JDownloader
  • 您将需要一个电子书或 PDF 阅读器来打开文件，具体取决于文件格式。
    推荐的电子书阅读器：Anna的档案在线查看器、ReadEra和Calibre
  • 使用在线工具进行格式转换。
    推荐的转换工具：CloudConvert和PrintFriendly
  • 您可以将 PDF 和 EPUB 文件发送到您的 Kindle 或 Kobo 电子阅读器。
    推荐的工具：亚马逊的“发送到 Kindle”和djazz 的“发送到 Kobo/Kindle”
  • 支持作者和图书馆
    ✍️ 如果您喜欢这个并且能够负担得起，请考虑购买原版，或直接支持作者。
    📚 如果您当地的图书馆有这本书，请考虑在那里免费借阅。