Among the most important of Erasmus'contributions to Christian humanism were his Greek text, new Latin translation, and annotations of the New Testament, an implicit challenge to the authority of the Vulgate and one that provoked numerous responses. This volume of the Collected Works contains translations of four of Erasmus'responses to his critics, written between 1520 and 1532 and directed primarily to his Franciscan and Dominican contemporaries at the university in Louvain. Three are connected to his Annotations on the New Testament. The fourth, a letter to Christopher von Utenheim, bishop of Basel, deals with pastoral questions such as fasting, abstinence, and the celibacy of priests. Though they mostly deal with philological rather than doctrinal matters, these debates were no less important to Erasmus'work. Carefully and extensively annotated by the translator, Denis L. Drysdall, volume 73 of the Collected Works invites the reader to examine Erasmus'own explanations of his philological method and its theological significance. Volume 73 of the Collected Works of Erasmus series.

upload/alexandrina/5. Ancient & Classical Civilizations Series/Collected Works of Erasmus/73. Desiderius Erasmus - Controversies (Collected Works of Erasmus, Book 73) [Retail].pdf

upload/alexandrina/7. Early Modern Series/Collected Works of Erasmus/73. Desiderius Erasmus - Controversies (Collected Works of Erasmus, Book 73) [Retail].pdf

zlib/no-category/Erasmus, Desiderius;Drysdall, Denis L.;/9781442648944.pdf_29293605.pdf

Controversies: v. [9]: Apologia de "In principio erat sermo" ; Apologia de loco "omnes quidem" ; De esu carnium ; De delectu ciborum scholia ; Responsio ad collationes

Apologia de "In principio erat sermo" ; Apologia de loco "Omens quidem" ; De esu carnium ; De delectu ciborum scholia ; Responsio ad Collationes

Collected Works of Erasmus : Controversies, Volume 73

Desiderius Erasmus; J Kelley Sowards; Jane E Phillips; Erika Rummel; István Pieter Bejczy; Denis L Drysdall; Charles Trinkaus; Peter Macardle; Clarence H Miller; James D Tracy; Manfred Hoffmann; Guy Bedouelle; Nelson H Minnich; Daniel J Sheerin; Charles Fantazzi

edited and translated by Denis L. Drysdall

Desiderius Erasmus; James K. Farge

Quite Imposing 1.5d (EN)

Collected works of Erasmus. Controversies, volume 73, Toronto ; Buffalo ; London, 2015

Collected works of Erasmus -- v. 73, Toronto, Buffalo, Ontario, 2015

Collected works of Erasmus, v. 71-78, 82-84, Toronto ; Buffalo, 1993

University of Toronto Press, Toronto [Ontario], 2015

Canada - English Language, Canada

Annotated, 2015-08-11

Toronto, 1974

Includes bibliographical references and indexes.
In English; translated from Latin.

Cover 1
Contents 8
Introduction 12
Translator’s Note 46
A Defence by Erasmus of Rotterdam Publicly Refuting the Mischievous Clamour of Certain Men among People both Influential and Humble to Whom They Declare that it was an Impiety on his Part to Translate in the Gospel of John: In principio erat sermo (1520a) Apologia Erasmi Roterodami palam refellens quorundam seditiosos clamores apud populum ac magnates, quibus ut impie factum iactitant, quod in evangelio Ioannis verterit ‘In principio erat sermo’ 48
A Defence by Desiderius Erasmus of Rotterdam of: In principio erat sermo (1520b) Desiderii Erasmi Roterodami Apologia de ‘In principio erat sermo’ 60
A Defence by Erasmus of Rotterdam against Criticism Made in Public Teaching by Nicolaas of Egmond of the Passage in Paul’s First Epistle to the Corinthians, Chapter 15 ‘We shall indeed all rise again, but we shall not all be changed’: Desiderii Erasmi Roterodami Apologia de loco taxato in publica professione per Nicolaum Ecmondanum Theologum et Carmelitanum Lovanii. Locus est in epistola Pauli ad Corinthios priore, cap XV: ‘Omnes quidem resurgemus, sed non omnes immutabimur’ 88
A Letter by Desiderius Erasmus Defending his Views Concerning the Prohibition on Eating Meat and Similar Human Regulations, to the Reverend Father in Christ and Honourable Prince Christopher, Bishop of Basel: Ad reverendum in Christo patrem et illustrem principem Christophorum episcopum Basiliensem, epistola apologetica Erasmi Roterodami, de interdicto esu carnium, deque similibus hominum constitutionibus 110
Notes on the Letter about Abstinence: In epistolam de delectu ciborum scholia 150
A Response by Desiderius Erasmus to the Discussions of a Certain ‘Youth Who Would Teach his Elders’: Desiderii Erasmi responsio ad Collationes cuiusdam iuvenis gerontodidascali 182
Works Frequently Cited 311
Short-Title Forms for Erasmus’ Works 316
Index of Scriptural References 322
Index of Greek and Latin Words cited 328
A 329
B 330
C 330
D 330
E 330
F 330
G 330
H 330
I 330
L 330
M 330
O 330
P 330
Q 330
R 330
S 330
T 331
V 331
General Index 332
A 332
B 333
C 333
D 334
E 334
F 335
G 335
H 336
I 336
J 336
L 336
M 337
N 337
O 337
P 338
Q 338
R 338
S 338
T 339
U 340
V 340
W 340
X 340
Z 340
MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict
MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict
MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict
MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict
MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict
MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict
MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict
MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict
MuPDF error: syntax error: invalid key in dict
Cover 1
Contents 8
Introduction 12
Translator’s Note 46
A Defence by Erasmus of Rotterdam Publicly Refuting the Mischievous Clamour of Certain Men among People both Influential and Humble to Whom They Declare that it was an Impiety on his Part to Translate in the Gospel of John: In principio erat sermo (1520a) Apologia Erasmi Roterodami palam refellens quorundam seditiosos clamores apud populum ac magnates, quibus ut impie factum iactitant, quod in evangelio Ioannis verterit ‘In principio erat sermo’ 48
A Defence by Desiderius Erasmus of Rotterdam of: In principio erat sermo (1520b) Desiderii Erasmi Roterodami Apologia de ‘In principio erat sermo’ 60
A Defence by Erasmus of Rotterdam against Criticism Made in Public Teaching by Nicolaas of Egmond of the Passage in Paul’s First Epistle to the Corinthians, Chapter 15 ‘We shall indeed all rise again, but we shall not all be changed’: Desiderii Erasmi Roterodami Apologia de loco taxato in publica professione per Nicolaum Ecmondanum Theologum et Carmelitanum Lovanii. Locus est in epistola Pauli ad Corinthios priore, cap XV: ‘Omnes quidem resurgemus, sed non omnes immutabimur’ 88
A Letter by Desiderius Erasmus Defending his Views Concerning the Prohibition on Eating Meat and Similar Human Regulations, to the Reverend Father in Christ and Honourable Prince Christopher, Bishop of Basel: Ad reverendum in Christo patrem et illustrem principem Christophorum episcopum Basiliensem, epistola apologetica Erasmi Roterodami, de interdicto esu carnium, deque similibus hominum constitutionibus 110
Notes on the Letter about Abstinence: In epistolam de delectu ciborum scholia 150
A Response by Desiderius Erasmus to the Discussions of a Certain ‘Youth Who Would Teach his Elders’: Desiderii Erasmi responsio ad Collationes cuiusdam iuvenis gerontodidascali 182
Works Frequently Cited 311
Short-Title Forms for Erasmus’ Works 316
Index of Scriptural References 322
Index of Greek and Latin Words cited 328
A 329
B 330
C 330
D 330
E 330
F 330
G 330
H 330
I 330
L 330
M 330
O 330
P 330
Q 330
R 330
S 330
T 331
V 331
General Index 332
A 332
B 333
C 333
D 334
E 334
F 335
G 335
H 336
I 336
J 336
L 336
M 337
N 337
O 337
P 338
Q 338
R 338
S 338
T 339
U 340
V 340
W 340
X 340
Z 340

The aim of the Collected Works of Erasmus is to make available an accurate, readable English text of Erasmus' correspondence and his other principal writings in an edition of 89 volumes. Erasmus was one of the architects of modern thought and his works reflect a vast range of interests including history, theology, the classics, social theory, education, political theory, literature, and the history of ideas. His letters remain the single most important source for the intellectual history of the Renaissance and Reformation. -- Publisher

Volume 73 of the Collected Works invites the reader to examine Erasmus' own explanations of his philological method and its theological significance.

2024-06-27